Fei
Fei
Posts: 88
|
Post by Fei on Oct 6, 2014 16:10:46 GMT -8
I vote for Joey. (Gonna try to upload a parchment later but, y'know, bad internet)
For me, this came down to who constructed their arguments best. Chris provided only examples, without and overarching view of how he wanted/did play this game and how he wanted to achieve it. Debbie was the opposite, only talking in very general terms.
Chris may have played a more flashy game. However, he's completely unable to wrap it up in a way that is compelling for the jury. I think that he was just so looking at the end and barfed the entirety of his strategy up at once. I also think that he's trying to apply a strategic framework to some of his decisions that were made emotionally (out of paranoia). Plus, him turning on me at the end, and his continual refusal to value the personal connections he made leaves me with a bitter taste in my mouth.
Debbie, while less of a goat than I originally thought, was similarly unable to sell her game and failed to provide enough specifics to cause me to consider voting for her.
Joey, on the other had, hasn't stopped playing. He played a clean and graceful game and even though I think he doesn't have as deep an understanding of everything that went on as Chris did, he knows how to present himself and really didn't get any blood on his hands. He was never in danger and played exactly how I wish I could have played.
|
|